Chronicle: Follow These People. Me: Article Too Long.

Andrea Jarrell pointed out an interesting article recently in the Chronicle of Higher Education. It’s a list of ten people to follow on Twitter, but it also includes some interesting discussion of what Twitter is and how you might use it. It’s geared toward academics — people who often live and interact in pages rather than sentences.

The piece includes this sentence:

With Twitter, no update can be longer than 140 characters, which, to give you a sense of that limit, is the precise length of this sentence.

It’s meant to be an example of how tough it might be to live in a 140-character box. My immediate response: that sentence is too long.

Later in the article, the list of people to follow comes along, and each one gets a name, a link, a sample Twitter update, and then between one and three paragraphs of description.

Again, I thought: too long. Just give me the list.

At first I thought this negative reaction to the article might have something to do with being corrupted by all this immediate-communication technology. I’ve been altered and can’t manage a sustained argument anymore. Fast food only, please. But I don’t think that’s true. (I know it’s not true. I write pieces that include sustained arguments and nuance for a living.)

Instead, I think it’s because, when I happened on the article, I was in burst-mode and wanted to grab information in bite-size chunks. However, since the article is not aimed at someone like me, but at a different kind of audience, there are certain conventions it must follow. It’s got to be sensitive to the reader.

The author of the piece is a Twitter user and presumably has similar sensibilities to other Twitter users. That is, shrt is gd. But, in essentially writing a travel piece, telling digital foreigners about a new land, the author admirably adopted the conventions and norms of his audience.

Interesting: In conveying the utility of Twitter, you’ve got to step completely out of its bounds.

Or just start using it and see what happens.

P.S. Bet u want list. Here:

  1. @PRsarahevansSarah Evans, dir pub rels @ Elgin Community College
  2. @jayrosen_nyuJay Rosen, assoc journo prof  @ NYU
  3. @hrheingoldHoward Rheingold, lecturer @ UCBerkeley
  4. @amandafrenchAmanda French, digital-curriculum expert @ NYU
  5. @academicdaveDavid Parry, asst prof emerging media & comms @ UT-Dallas
  6. @dancohenDan Cohen, dir Ctr For History & New Media @ George Mason University
  7. @paullevPaul Levinson, prof of new media @ Fordham
  8. @mcleodScott McLeod, assoc prof @ Iowa State
  9. @mweschMichael L. Wesch, asst prof of cultural anthro @ Kansas State
  10. @presidentgeeGordon Gee, pres of Ohio State

Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “Chronicle: Follow These People. Me: Article Too Long.”

  1. bradrourke

    I liked the detail in the article too. Don’t get me wrong. It was interesting how it illustrated to me that foreign-ness of Twitter to most people.

  2. Caryn Martinez

    I agree that serving your audience is of the utmost importance. I personally love the detail in the article. It gives me clear reasons why I might benefit from the advice of the list members. The author has saved the readers a lot of time and effort by doing all of the research for us.

Leave a comment